WASHINGTON — In a pivotal week, President Trump engages in critical discussions with French President Emmanuel Macron and British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, as transatlantic relations face significant challenges. Trump’s new approach to American foreign policy, emphasizing a rapid conclusion to the conflict in Ukraine, signals a departure from traditional European leadership roles.
Shortly into his second term, Trump has made controversial demands, including claims on territories such as Greenland and Canada, as well as access to rare earth minerals from Ukraine. His administration is seen by some as overshadowing decades of U.S. diplomacy that aimed to provide global stability following the collapse of the Soviet Union.
Experts express concern that Trump’s actions may erode long-standing U.S. policies aimed at countering aggressors, with significant implications for international governance and cooperation.
Ian Kelly, a former U.S. ambassador, remarked on the disheartening shift, noting the lack of critical reflection on over eight decades of established foreign policy principles. “This is not peace through strength — this is peace through surrender,” he cautioned.
As the war in Ukraine reaches its three-year mark, Macron’s visit on Monday, followed by Starmer’s on Thursday, underscores the urgency for strong transatlantic dialogue in the face of escalating tensions.
Trump’s criticisms of Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, particularly regarding his negotiation stance, have alarmed European leaders. His recent moves to engage diplomatically with Russian officials without appropriate Ukrainian involvement further complicate the situation.
Upcoming discussions at the United Nations will highlight divergent approaches to addressing Russian military actions in Ukraine, with a recent U.S. resolution lacking consensus on immediate withdrawal demands made by Ukraine and the European Union.
While Zelenskyy seeks a comprehensive economic deal linked to security guarantees, Trump administration officials anticipate a potential agreement that could strengthen U.S.-Ukrainian economic ties, a move contrary to Russian interests.
In the ongoing dialogue, tensions are evident, as Trump criticized Zelenskyy and referred to him unfavorably. Zelenskyy’s call for peace and NATO alignment has sparked further discord, with experts suggesting that direct confrontation may not be the most effective strategy.
Retired Admiral Mark Montgomery advised caution, emphasizing that the current administration’s actions may destabilize longstanding alliances rather than disrupt adversaries.
As Macron and Starmer advance their diplomatic efforts, they are expected to remind Trump of the necessity to maintain a strong stance against Putin to uphold American credibility on the global stage.
Macron stressed the importance of unwavering resolve, stating, “How can you then be credible in the face of China if you’re weak in the face of Putin?”
Despite Trump’s admiration for Putin, concerning sentiments linger among seasoned diplomats regarding the administration’s strategy. Their apprehensions underscore the urgency for a coherent and united response to the ongoing geopolitical challenges.
