Chadema’s Vice Chairman, Tundu Lissu, recently criticized his party Chairman, Freeman Mbowe, calling him a liar during an interview at JNIA in Dar es Salaam on January 6. This clash signals growing tensions within the party as Mr. Mbowe faces a significant political challenge.
If the current trend continues, the internal rivalry between these prominent leaders may escalate, leading to a fierce battle for control within Chadema.
During his return from abroad, Mr. Lissu, known for his fiery activism, responded to media inquiries, highlighting the ongoing struggle between opposing factions within Tanzania’s largest and most active opposition party. The party’s election is set for January 21, intensifying the stakes for its leaders.
The back-and-forth between Mbowe and Lissu reflects deep-seated divisions within the party, with each leader exchanging accusations and insults. Recently, Mr. Mbowe labeled Lissu as naive and self-serving, while Lissu took aim at Mbowe’s leadership capabilities and integrity.
Amidst these conflicts, Mr. Lissu has positioned himself as a reformer, campaigning against perceived corruption in the party’s establishment. His approach seeks to bolster his image as a dedicated leader capable of guiding Chadema towards future success.
The rivalry is further fueled by younger party members like Ezekia Wenje and John Henche, who are vocally supporting their respective candidates ahead of the crucial election. This escalating conflict can be described as political chauvinism, where leaders are excessively asserting their dedication to the party at the expense of unity.
The situation intensified after Lissu publicly declared his candidacy for the party’s top leadership, accusing Mbowe of corruption and incompetence. Mbowe responded by reaffirming his commitment to the party, insisting he would not abandon it during turbulent times.
If the current state of affairs continues unchecked, Chadema risks internal collapse, jeopardizing its ability to present a united front in upcoming elections. The leadership struggles reveal an urgent need for the party to focus on cohesion rather than its leaders’ personal rivalries.
The internal strife raises serious questions about Chadema’s prospects for success in future elections. As the party grapples with its identity and leadership, it risks alienating its base and undermining its core principles of democracy and unity.
In light of these developments, it is crucial for Chadema’s leaders to recognize the destructive nature of their ongoing feud. Without decisive action, the party may face significant consequences in the political landscape of Tanzania.
As the saying goes, “A divided house cannot stand.” If Chadema leaders continue to engage in public disputes, it may ultimately lead to their own downfall at the polls.
