PUBLISHED: 14 Jan 2025 at 05:00
Thailand is preparing to adopt nuclear power technology amid efforts to enhance clean electricity use. However, the implementation of the new power development plan (PDP), which includes the development of small modular reactors (SMRs), is currently facing delays.
SMRs, capable of generating up to 300 megawatts per unit, represent a significant advancement in nuclear technology, offering one-third the generating capacity of traditional reactors, according to industry experts.
The PDP, applicable from 2024 to 2037, has not yet been enforced, but cooperation between the Energy Regulatory Commission and the Office of Atoms for Peace aims to streamline nuclear power and electricity management in the country.
Recent announcements indicate that the Office of Atoms for Peace will focus on nuclear safety, while the Energy Regulatory Commission addresses energy security and grid reliability. Legal considerations and discussions surrounding SMR technology are anticipated between the agencies.
Government sources suggest that the SMR project will not advance until the agencies develop a clear nuclear power strategy. An anonymous energy official stated, “The responsibility of communicating Thailand’s SMR plans lies with policymakers.”
The PDP envisions the construction of two SMRs, each with a 300MW capacity, slated to begin operations towards the end of the plan. The Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand is expected to oversee their development and operation.
However, the future of SMR development may pivot in response to advancements in alternative clean fuels and technologies that offer low carbon emission levels.
The PDP aims for clean power sources, including nuclear energy, to account for 51% of total fuel use by 2037, a substantial increase from 20% at the end of 2023. Meanwhile, coal and gas usage is projected to decrease to 48% from nearly 80% in early 2024.
Only 1% of energy needs will be met by nuclear and emerging energy solutions targeting fossil fuel reduction and electricity conservation.
Delays in the PDP’s implementation arise from disagreements among energy experts, despite having undergone public hearings. Critics argue that the renewable energy targets are insufficient to achieve the government’s carbon dioxide emissions reduction goals, while the plan’s long-term power demand estimations may impose excessive financial strain on the government.
