The initiative by Pheu Thai lawmaker Prayuth Siripanich to introduce an “anti-coup bill” is facing significant opposition and may struggle to secure approval from parliament, according to political analysts.
In response to widespread criticism, Mr. Prayuth, a list MP from Pheu Thai, announced his decision to withdraw the bill aimed at preventing military coups, citing a need for revisions before resubmission to parliament.
After a party meeting, Mr. Prayuth reaffirmed his commitment to the initiative, stating that a refined version of the bill will be reintroduced in alignment with Section 77 of the constitution.
He emphasized the necessity of imposing limits on military power to maintain national stability.
The initial version of the bill, which originated from the Defence Ministry under Sutin Klungsang, sought to alter the Defence Ministry Administration Act, rendered under Section 133 (2) of the charter, thus not requiring prior endorsement from a party meeting.
Despite the lack of necessity for a party endorsement, Pheu Thai will likely review the proposal before it is forwarded to parliament for further evaluation.
The bill has faced backlash from at least two coalition parties and the opposition, with statements indicating a refusal to support the proposal if brought before parliament.
Pheu Thai’s deputy secretary-general, Linthiporn Warinwatchararoj, acknowledged that some member MPs have expressed dissent toward a bill that would enable the cabinet to approve the appointment of generals via a committee comprising the defence minister and military chiefs.
Provisions in the bill propose eligibility criteria for future generals, including a clean record free from undue influence or connections to illicit activities. Moreover, it seeks to amend Section 35 to prevent the use of military power in cases where government control is seized, affording officers the right to refuse compliance with unlawful orders.
Under the proposed changes, the prime minister would assume the role of Defence Council chairman instead of the current defence minister.
An opinion survey concerning the bill was launched in parliament, with results expected by January 1.
Mr. Prayuth’s proposal stands among three attempts to revise the Defence Ministry Administration Act, with alternatives proposed by both the main opposition and the Ministry itself during Sutin’s tenure.
Military Reform Advocacy
Mr. Prayuth expressed that his intentions are not adversarial towards the military but are focused on enhancing the efficiency of armed forces through legislative reform.
He acknowledged the military’s role as essential for national security, especially during natural disasters, while advocating for reforms to address existing flaws in the proposal—specifically the extent of cabinet influence over general appointments.
A political science expert conveyed that while no laws exist to completely eliminate the potential for coups, the introduction of an anti-coup bill serves as a symbolic expression of societal resistance against military takeovers.
Legislative Initiatives for Deterrence
Prominent local voices suggest that enhancing government integrity and reducing corruption are pivotal in genuinely safeguarding against military interventions.
Former senator Wanchai Sornsiri warned that political actors pushing such bills may further polarize civilian-military relations, which could hinder broad acceptance.
Political analyst Wanwichit Boonprong remarked that Pheu Thai is navigating precarious territory with its proposal, indicating a strategy to gauge military responses while maintaining control over armed forces dynamics.
Overall, while reforms are sought, many anticipate significant resistance from coalition partners and the Senate regarding the anti-coup measures.
