The government of Samoa has been recognized for its significant achievement in hosting the Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting (CHOGM), navigating the complexities of the event with support from larger Commonwealth nations.
As the first Pacific island to gain independence in 1962, Samoa has demonstrated a steadfast commitment to peace and harmony among its diverse ethnic groups. Notably, a constitutional crisis in 2021 was resolved without violence, showcasing the nation’s dedication to non-militarization and peaceful conflict resolution.
Prime Minister Fiame Naomi Mataafa’s administration took extensive measures to ensure the welfare of the approximately 4,000 delegates attending CHOGM, even in the face of accommodation and logistical challenges.
However, the turnout of heads of government was notably disappointing, with only 20 leaders attending—lower than the previous low of 27 in Colombo in 2013—highlighting concerns about the Commonwealth’s relevance. Key absences included the Prime Minister of India, who opted for the BRICS summit in Russia over the Samoa meeting, raising questions about the significance of CHOGM in the eyes of global leaders.
This situation reflects deeper issues within the Commonwealth, as noted by a veteran observer who mentioned that many busy leaders perceive the agenda as lacking substance, leading to a decline in attendance at meetings. The absence of leaders at key events risks eroding valuable connections between them and the Commonwealth Secretary-General.
Currently, the Commonwealth is primarily comprised of small island developing states (SIDS), which often struggle for international visibility. Nearly half of the Commonwealth’s 56 members fall into this category. The organization has historically supported these nations symbolically and practically, addressing issues like trade and education, and focusing urgently on climate change, especially highlighted at the Samoa CHOGM.
Despite the emphasis on small states, the Commonwealth’s mission is broader, embodying enduring principles such as the rule of law and democratic governance—Legacies that have significantly contributed to global progress yet are often undervalued or criticized by contemporary activists. Many citizens in Commonwealth nations, particularly younger generations, appreciate the benefits of shared traditions and languages birthed from a complex historical context.
While a vocal minority critiques the colonial past, the majority recognize the opportunities created by the Commonwealth. The interplay of politics can complicate this perception, as some leaders adopt nuanced views of colonial legacies, acknowledging beneficial aspects for societal progress.
The aspiration remains that the 2.5 billion people in the Commonwealth who value these connections will advocate for the institution’s continued relevance. This diversity is evident in the collaborative spirit observed at Commonwealth events, including CHOGM, despite some criticisms labeling it as a relic of Empire.
As the Commonwealth faces pressures from political correctness, it is crucial to assess its evolution fairly over the last seventy years. Identity politics could pose risks to the Commonwealth’s unity if not managed carefully. The call for reparations within the Commonwealth context raises concerns about exacerbating tensions that could undermine fellowship among member states. Given the pressing global challenges, the focus should shift toward collective efforts empowering all communities rather than engaging in divisive debates.
For the Commonwealth to remain effective, internal reforms are necessary to uphold its principles and ensure each member adheres to the Charter’s values. This includes reviewing the effectiveness of programs and optimizing resources while maintaining transparency and sound governance practices.
