The upcoming U.S. election is poised to significantly impact foreign policy, particularly regarding the ongoing conflict in the Middle East. With the election set for November, we analyze how each candidate may approach this critical issue.
The conflict in the Middle East remains a top priority for the current U.S. administration. Recent discussions between President Biden and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu highlight the urgency of addressing this situation. Both candidates in the upcoming election will need to present clear strategies for dealing with the Middle East crisis.
Recent statements from Vice President Kamala Harris reveal her alignment with President Biden regarding Israel’s right to self-defense. She has made it known that she would not endorse an arms embargo against Israel, in contrast to some progressive factions within the Democratic Party. Harris has also underscored the importance of a cease-fire arrangement to address humanitarian concerns, while emphasizing the need for dialogue regarding the suffering of Palestinians.
On the other hand, former President Donald Trump’s foreign policy approach appears inconsistent. His relationship with Netanyahu has fluctuated, yet he has recently expressed strong support for Israel, claiming that a reelected Trump administration would fortify ties with the nation. Despite his historical ties to the Abraham Accords, Trump has been vague about his plans for Gaza and has voiced controversial opinions regarding the Palestinian people.
As the situation in Ukraine continues to evolve, Harris maintains that U.S. support for Ukraine is vital for the preservation of international order. She has highlighted her commitment to a just resolution to the conflict, asserting that any negotiations must include Ukrainian interests. In contrast, Trump’s dealings with Russia raised eyebrows, with reports indicating that he has maintained ongoing communication with President Vladimir Putin even after leaving office.
NATO relations represent a significant divergence between the two candidates, with Harris emphasizing the alliance’s importance as part of her broader foreign policy vision. Conversely, concerns linger regarding Trump’s inconsistent stance on NATO, with many fearing a potential withdrawal that could jeopardize international partnerships. This issue could prove critical as candidates appeal to traditional Republicans and moderates.
Both candidates have addressed the relationship with China, a focal point in U.S. foreign policy discussions. Trump aims to expand tariffs established during his presidency, a measure the current administration has largely upheld. Harris has emphasized cybersecurity and technological advancements, yet specifics on her approach to China remain somewhat unclear, mirroring a trend observed in other aspects of their foreign policy positions.
