Thailand’s Prime Minister Srettha Thavisin has reaffirmed the nation’s commitment to sovereignty in light of international concerns related to the Constitutional Court’s dissolution of the Move Forward Party. He emphasized that Thailand is a democratic nation capable of addressing its internal matters independently, thereby dismissing any notion of foreign interference.
Responding to questions regarding statements from foreign governments, Srettha stated, “I am certain that all Thai people understand we will not allow a foreign nation to interfere with our sovereignty.” He noted that any foreign commentary should be viewed as recommendations rather than interference, urging collaborative navigation in today’s complex global landscape.
In light of the court ruling, which deemed Move Forward’s proposed changes to the lese-majeste law as a threat to national security, Srettha acknowledged the party’s strong reaction but expressed his belief that there was no intention to incite public discord. He maintained confidence that Move Forward would respect the court’s decision and adapt accordingly.
The Prime Minister is scheduled to meet with the Ministry of Foreign Affairs to craft an appropriate response to recent foreign statements while respecting international relations. Alongside security officials, Srettha said there have been no identifiable threats of unrest following the ruling.
On upcoming judicial scrutiny of his ethics related to the appointment of a cabinet minister, Srettha admitted to feeling a degree of anxiety; however, he remains assured that it will not impede his duties. The case originates from the controversial appointment of politician Pichit Chuenban, who resigned promptly to mitigate political fallout, yet the court has chosen to proceed with the case.
Following the ruling, foreign diplomats are reminded of the importance of adhering to international etiquette when expressing opinions, reflecting the need for all nations to uphold their legal processes and regulations.
The U.S. State Department described the court’s decision as a threat to Thailand’s democratic advancement and emphasized the necessity for inclusive political engagement. Meanwhile, the European Union labeled the ruling as a significant setback for political plurality, asserting that democracy cannot thrive without multiple parties and candidates.
Human rights organizations have condemned the court’s decision, indicating it threatens democratic principles and illustrates a tendency to intimidate dissenters within the nation.
